30-meter shaded relief image of Okmok Volcano, Umnak Island, Alaska

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
30-meter shaded relief image of Okmok Volcano, Umnak Island, Alaska
Abstract:
This 30-meter, horizontal, cell-size, shaded relief, georeferenced TIFF image of Okmok Volcano, Umnak Island, Alaska, was created by combining digital elevation model (DEM) data provided by NASA's shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) and the aircraft-mounted synthetic aperture radar (AirSAR) mission.
Supplemental_Information:
The DGGS metadata standard extends the FGDC standard to include elements that are required to facilitate our internal data management. These elements, referred to as "layers," group and describe files that have intrinsic logical or topological relationships and correspond to subdirectories within the data distribution package. The metadata layer provides an FGDC metadata file and may include other documentation files. Attribute information for each data layer is described in this metadata file under the "Entity_and_Attribute_Information" section. Data layer contents:
shaded-relief-image:    A georeferenced TIFF image of Okmok Volcano, Umnak Island, Alaska
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Schaefer, J.R., 2005, 30-meter shaded relief image of Okmok Volcano, Umnak Island, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2005-1, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -169.046430
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -166.904289
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 54.050037
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 52.949343

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: 2003
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: georeferenced TIFF

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a raster data set.

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 2
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -171
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0
      False_Easting: 500000.000000
      False_Northing: 0

      Planar coordinates are encoded using row and column
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 30.003283
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 30.003283
      Planar coordinates are specified in meters

      The horizontal datum used is World Geodetic System of 1984.
      The ellipsoid used is WGS 84.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257223563.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    rdf2005-1-shaded-relief-image
    A georeferenced TIFF image of Okmok Volcano, Umnak Island, Alaska (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEM data is available for download courtesy of NASA. AirSAR data was provided by NASA JPL via Rick Guritz at the Alaska SAR Facility (ASF)

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    GIS Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    dggsgis@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays


Why was the data set created?

This georeferenced TIFF was created to be used as a base layer for other geographic information system (GIS) projects that display geographic or geologic data pertaining to Okmok Volcano and eastern Umnak Island. This shaded relief image displays topographic features for all of Okmok Volcano, and a small area to the east, across Umnak pass, on Unalaska Island.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    NASA SRTM DEM, 2003 (source 1 of 2)
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 2003, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEM data, files N53W168.hdr and N53W169.hdr: Initial release 2003, U.S. Geological Survey, unknown.

    Other_Citation_Details: 2 digital files
    Type_of_Source_Media: on-line
    Source_Contribution: Convert SRTM DEM files to ArcGRID format

    AirSAR DEM, 2001 (source 2 of 2)
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the Alaska SAR Facility (ASF), 2001, AirSAR DEM data for Okmok Volcano: Initial release September 2001, Alaska SAR Facility, Fairbanks, AK.

    Other_Citation_Details: 1 CD
    Type_of_Source_Media: CD
    Source_Contribution: Convert AirSAR DEM files to ArcGRID format

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2004 (process 1 of 3)
    Convert SRTM DEM files to ArcGRID format - Two SRTM DEM datasets were downloaded in May 2003 from USGS online repository. The SRTM DEM datasets were converted to ArcGRID format and merged. The merged grid was reprojected to from GCS WGS84 to Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 2, choosing a cell size of 30 meters.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASA SRTM DEM, 2003

    Date: 2004 (process 2 of 3)
    Convert AirSAR DEM files to ArcGRID format - AirSAR DEM data (GeoTIFF format) were provided to DGGS from the Alaska SAR Facility (ASF) in September 2001. The AirSAR DEM GeoTIFF was converted to ArcGRID format. To determine horizontal accuracy, a 10m contour map of the AirSAR DEM ArcGRID was created. The contour lines were overlayed onto IKONOS imagery (see Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report). Based on results discussed in Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report, horizontal correction was applied to the AirSAR DEM ArcGRID file.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • AirSAR DEM, 2001

    Date: 2004 (process 3 of 3)
    Create georeferenced shaded relief TIFF - The horizontally corrected AirSAR DEM ArcGRID file was merged with the SRTM DEM ArcGRID file by replacing all SRTM DEM values less than zero with the AirSAR DEM value. ArcMap 8.2 3D-Analyst extension was used to create a hillshade image GRID with 2x vertical exaggeration. The resulting grid was converted to a georefenced TIFF by adding corner control points (RMS error = 0) and rectifying the image using bilinear interpretation.

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Beget, J.E., Larsen, J.F., Neal, C.A., Nye, C.J., and Schaefer, J.R., 2005, Preliminary volcano-hazard assessment for Okmok Volcano, Umnak Island, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2004-3, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 32 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:150,000
    Schaefer, J.R., 2005, 30-meter shaded relief image of Okmok Volcano, Umnak Island, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2005-1, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Schaefer, J.R., Larsen, J.F., and Unema, J.A., 2012, Digital elevation model (DEM) and shaded relief image of Okmok Caldera, 2010: Raw Data File RDF 2011-6, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    RGB values of the hillshade were computed from the DEM data using ESRI software Arc 8.2 3-D analyst extension.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    Sub-meter horizontal/vertical accuracy GPS points that were acquired during the summer field season 2000 and 2001 were used to assess the geospatial accuracy of IKONOS remotely sensed imagery. The GPS data collection points were chosen so that they would be visible and distinguishable on the imagery. In a GIS, the GPS points were overlain on the georeferenced IKONOS imagery. The horizontal geospatial accuracy of the remotely sensed imagery was determined to be less than 15 meters. This imagery was then used as the geospatially accurate reference to determine the accuracey of the DEM data. A 10-meter contour map was made of each DEM dataset. The contour map based on the SRTM DEM data was overlain on the sub-15-meter accurate IKONOS imagery. Visual inspections at a zoom scale of 1:3,000 determined that the horizontal accuracy was correct and no adjustments were made to the SRTM DEM data. The contour map based on the AirSAR DEM data, however, appeared to be inaccurate (creeks did not line up with V-contours, high points did not line up with high-point closed contours, etc.). At a zoom scale of 1:3,000, ten visually distinguishable points were chosen to determine an X-shift and Y-shift needed to align the AirSAR DEM-derived contour data to the imagery. Results (average and standard deviation reported): X = 41 +/- 9 meters, Y = 198 +/- 19 meters. A shift of X = -41 and Y = 198 was applied to the AirSAR DEM dataset. An accuracy of less than 60 meters, or 2 cell sizes, is observed for all visually recognizable data points that can be used to compare the IKONOS imagery to the DEM-derived contour data.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

    Although the vertical data cannot be directly derived from this TIFF data, this vertical positional accuracy report was written to qualify the resulting shade effect that has been derived from a conversion between vertical value and RGB hillshade value. After an assessment of the horizontal accuracy was complete, it was then possible to assess the vertical accuracy (see Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report). Thirty-five sub-meter horizontal/vertical accuracy GPS points that were acquired during the summer field season 2000 and 2001 were used to assess the vertical accuracy. A calculation of the known GPS vertical value minus the SRTM DEM vertical value for the same horizontal position showed that the SRTM vertical data was under-estimating the elevation by 19.3 +/- 4.3 meters (mean and standard deviation of the 35 points reported). Twenty-nine GPS points were used in the same way to assess the vertical accuracy of the AirSAR DEM data. The results of the GPS minus AirSAR vertical values for the same horizontal point (after the X-Y shift was applied) are -0.3 +/- 5.44 (mean and standard deviation reported for 29 points). In conclusion, the vertical values for the SRTM DEM dataset overestimate the true vertical value by about 19 meters, and the AirSAR DEM data vertical values are accurate to about 5 meters. Prior to creating the shaded relief image, these two datasets were combined by filling in any holes of the SRTM data with the AirSAR data. The bulk of the data used to derive the shaded relief image came from the SRTM data, and therefore the vertical accuracy for the values used to create the shaded relief image are taken to be about 19 meters. This agrees well with the NASA reported error for the dataset which is 20 meters.

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    This shaded relief image displays topographic features for all of Okmok Volcano, and a very small area to the east, across Umnak pass, on Unalaska Island. It was originally intended as a base layer for the display of geographic, geologic, and volcano-hazard features of Okmok Volcano, at a scale of 1:150,000.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Shaded relief image was checked for accurate display of topographic features with on-the-ground inspection (geologic fieldwork), helicopter overflights, and imagery sets such as Landsat7, air-photos, and IKONOS.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (<http://www.dggs.alaska.gov>) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    RDF 2005-1

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 18-Jul-2014
Metadata author:
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
Metadata Manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)

Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.9.21 on Fri Jul 18 10:25:44 2014