Surficial-geologic map of the Livengood area, central Alaska

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title: Surficial-geologic map of the Livengood area, central Alaska
Abstract:
This map shows the distribution of surficial deposits and undifferentiated bedrock in parts of the Livengood C-3 and C-4 quadrangles, Tolovana mining district.
Supplemental_Information:
The DGGS metadata standard extends the FGDC standard to include elements that are required to facilitate our internal data management. These elements, referred to as "layers," group and describe files that have intrinsic logical or topological relationships. Attribute information for each layer is included in this metadata file under the "Entity_and_Attribute_Information" section. The metadata "layer" provides the metadata, codesets, or other documentation files applicable to all layers. The data layer(s) are titled: >MapUnitPolys: Polygons that record the distribution of map units >ContactsAndFaults: Lines that record contacts between map units, faults that bound map units, and associated dangling faults
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Reger, R.D., and Burns, P.A.C., 2013, Surficial-geologic map of the Livengood area, central Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2013-2, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, AK, USA.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 1 sheet, scale 1:50,000.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -148.755888
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -148.241515
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 65.630354
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 65.495495

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: 2003
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a vector data set.

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 6
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -147
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0
      False_Easting: 500000.000000
      False_Northing: 0

      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000001
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000001
      Planar coordinates are specified in meters

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1927.
      The ellipsoid used is North American Datum of 1927.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.4.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.9786982.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    ri2013-2-MapUnitPolys
    Polygons that record the distribution of map units (Source: NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    MapUnitPol
    Primary key, uniquely identifies each polygon (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Alpha-numeric characters that uniquely identify each polygon. The general form: publication number of the report followed by an auto-generated numeric value.

    MapUnit
    Short ASCII string that classifies the map unit (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    QelxFROZEN LOESS WITH CONSIDERABLE GROUND ICE-On north-, east-, and west-facing upper and middle slopes, a blanket 1.5 to 14 m thick of massive to laminated, very well sorted eolian silt typically contains soil horizons and organic layers (Kreig and Reger, 1982, plate12). Transitional on middle slopes with retransported silt and lowland loess covering lower slopes. Thickness increases from Livengood northward toward the main source of eolian sediments in the Yukon River lowland (Williams, 1962; Brown and Kreig, 1983; Muhs and Budhan, 2006). Perennially frozen to within ≤1 m of ground surface and locally contains massive ground ice (Kreig and Reger, 1982, plate 12, table 18). Dissected by dendritic, pinnate gullies with convex walls and narrow floors (Kreig and Reger, 1982, plate 12, fig. 8). Tree cover is dominantly black spruce forest mixed with scattered paper birch; large black spruce trees and willow shrubs follow drainages, where perennially frozen ground is deeper. Includes unit Qe of Athey and others (2004a).
    b'THINLY COVERED BEDROCK-Subcrops covered by less than 0.9 m of loess and frost-rived and weathered bedrock. Bedrock structures visible through thin veneer of surficial debris.
    QerRETRANSPORTED SILT AND LOWLAND LOESS-Chiefly massive to laminated organic silt and silt with trace to some fine sand, lenses and tongues of locally derived gravel, and scattered to numerous angular rock fragments (particularly in upper valleys of small, ephemeral streams). Deposited primarily by hyperconcentrated flows (Tuck, 1940; Taber, 1953, 1958; Costa, 1988; Fraser and Burn, 1997) draining weathered bedrock slopes thinly covered by upland silt (loess) and generated by thawing ice-rich perma-frost or during brief, intense summer rainstorms. Complexly mixed with gelifluction and debris-flow deposits in upper stream drainages and primary airfall loess in lowland sites (Kreig and Reger, 1982). Transitional on middle slopes with frozen loess containing considerable ground ice. Fluvial processes >> colluvial processes. Lowland surfaces fairly smooth with scattered open-system pingos and local thermokarst pits, ponds, and lakes. Erosion on slopes by ephemeral drainages produces subparallel gullies separated by linear ridges and ellipsoidal and triangular remnants that are generally shallowly frozen, except beneath well developed aspen and birch on upper south-facing aspects (Kreig and Reger, 1982, plate 11). May be subject to seasonal stream and slope icings. Locally contains fossil remains of late Pleistocene mammals. Continuously to discontinuously frozen with moderate to high ice content; locally contains considerable massive ground ice (Kreig and Reger, 1982, plate 12) (yedoma of Kanevskiy and others, 2011). Includes unit cf of Waythomas and others (1984) and units Qcfl, Qcfu, and Qe-c of Athey and others (2004a).
    QcfMIXED COLLUVIUM AND ALLUVIUM-Primarily elongate, massive to poorly stratified, generally inorganic silt (loess) mixed with locally auriferous, sandy, angular to subangular, pebble and cobble gravels with scattered boulders derived from weathered bedrock uplands. Deposited in the upper drainages of small tributaries by debris flows and hyperconcentrated flows produced during brief, intense, local summer storms. Grades downvalley into retransported silt and lowland loess and stream terraces at the margins of lowlands. Colluvial processes > fluvial processes. Surface slightly uneven. Discontinuously to continuously frozen with low to moderate ice contents.
    bEXPOSED BEDROCK-Outcrop and rubble crop that show no evidence of downslope displacement.
    QelLOESS-A blanket generally less than 1 m thick of massive, very well sorted eolian silt with thin, local, oxidized weathering profiles and traces of organic material covers ridge crests and upper south-facing slopes. Small, frost-jacked angular rock fragments are locally present close to underlying weathered bedrock. Sections exhibit lamination parallel to the ground surface resulting from the formation of thin, ground-ice lenses during seasonal freezing. Permafrost is absent. Dissected by concave-floored gullies separated by parallel to subparallel, rounded, low ridges where loess is thicker (Kreig and Reger, 1982, plate 11, plate 12, fig. 8). Tree cover is a forest of closely spaced, mixed paper birch and white or black spruce or pure stands of paper birch, except on steep, dry, south-facing slopes where stands of quaking aspen dominate a woodland of scattered, mixed white birch and white spruce. Includes unit Qe of Athey and others (2004a).
    QatTERRACE ALLUVIUM-Chiefly moderately to well-sorted pebble and cobble gravels with some silty sand and local silt lenses no longer flooded by the streams that deposited the alluvium, which is locally auriferous. Covered by 1 to 2 m of overbank silts and sands. Locally covered by several meters of retransported silt and lowland loess. May include several levels. Locally subject to inundation by seasonal slope and stream icings. Continuously to discontinuously frozen with low to moderate ice contents.
    QaUNDIFFERENTIATED ALLUVIUM-Chiefly moderately to well-sorted, stratified, polymictic pebble, cobble, and boulder gravel, sand, and silt comprising channel and overbank deposits of generally small streams. Clasts of the local bedrock are rounded to subangular. Locally auriferous. Unfrozen to discontinuously frozen with low to moderate ice contents.
    QclLANDSLIDE DEPOSITS-Matrix-supported silty diamicton with numerous angular to subangular pebbles, cobbles, and boulders of Amy Creek dolomite and limestone and Amy Creek siliceous mudstone and chert east of lower Amy Creek. Previously mapped as debris fan and reworked loess by Athey and others (2004a,b). Slide in the vicinity of lower Amy Creek measures l.37 km long by up to 1.1 km wide, and the 3.5-m-thick slide deposit is composed of three 0.8- to 1.5-m-thick, very pale brown (10YR8/3) to reddish yellow (7.5YR7/6), massive, horizontal beds that could indicate a history of three failure events. In that section, the slide overlies thrust-faulted Amy Creek dolomite and limestone bedrock (Athey and others, 2004a,b) that is altered to dark yellowish brown (10YR6/8) to white (10YR8/1) and contains lenses of rotated, angular fragments of dark gray Amy Creek siliceous mudstone and chert. The slide is overlain by ~1.3 m of artificially emplaced silty mining debris. The slide on the western flank of the bedrock ridge between Lucky and Goldstream creeks is deeply dissected, and the slide headwall at ~530 m (~1,750 ft) elevation is subdued, indicating the antiquity of the deposit. Discontinuously frozen with low to moderate ice contents.
    waterwater
    QhPLACER TAILINGS AND ARTIFICIAL FILLS-Chiefly gravel mixed with angular to subangular rock rubble, sand, and silt in placer-mine tailings, ditches, active surface-mine pits, and borrow pits for road construction or heterogeneous fine-grained excavated overburden and fillings of siltation ponds. Extents determined on 1978 and 1986 aerial photography, except in western Livengood Creek area, determined on 2001 aerial photography. Includes fluvial deposits in valley bottoms and fluvial-colluvial sediments in upper drainages that were mined for placers (Mertie, 1918; 1937; Cobb, 1973; Karl and others, 1988).
    QsSWAMP DEPOSIT-Elongate deposit of silt and organic material in impoundment basin behind Hess Creek dam, which was filled to seasonally supply water for mining purposes until 1984 and drained in winter to allow embankments and related structures to refreeze (Brown and Kreig, 1983). A photograph taken on 07/22/2011 during an aerial survey by DNR personnel revealed that the impoundment basin is drained.
    QfbBENCH ALLUVIUM-Locally auriferous, oxidized alluvial gravels that are present on bedrock benches well above local streams as a result of a long and complex history of stream piracy and tectonic deformation in the Livengood area (Mertie, 1918, 1937; Cobb, 1973; Athey and Craw, 2004). On Livengood Bench, 3 to 15 m of crudely bedded, moderately to well-sorted, subrounded, oxidized, polymictic pebble and cobble gravels with some sand; contains organic and inorganic silt lenses up to 8 m long and 0.5 m thick with scattered fossilized wood fragments and stumps up to 0.3 m in diameter. One silt lens contained late Miocene to Pliocene pollen (Karl and others, 1988). The bench gravels are 15 to 25 m above the modern drainage and are overlain by 15 to 40 m of frozen, retransported silt and lowland loess. The age of the thick, fine-grained overburden is bracketed by the ages of two samples of wood from the base of the silt, which are dated at 28,470 +/- 600 RC yr B.P. (Beta-6026) and 29,460 +/- 480 RC yr. B.P. (Beta-6025), and a single wood date from 2 m below the top of the exposed frozen silt that dated 26,410 +/- 540 RC yr. B.P. (Beta-6027) (Waythomas and others, 1984). Continuously to discontinuously frozen with low to moderate ice contents.

    IdentityCo
    Indicates degree of confidence in the identification and classification of the map unit (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    certainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.

    Label
    The label values provide the FGDCGeoAge font characters that are required to display the geologic age symbols that are appropriate to the map unit assigned in the corresponding MapUnit field. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:FGDCGeoAge font
    Codeset Source:Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:MapUnit
    Codeset Source:MapUnit field of this dataset

    Symbol
    References the CMYK color value that was assigned to the map unit (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    1230CMYK value - C:13%, M:20%, Y:30%, K:0%
    0001CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:0%, K:13%
    0A20CMYK value - C:0%, M:8%, Y:20%, K:0%
    2360CMYK value - C:20%, M:30%, Y:60%, K:0%
    0003CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:0%, K:30%
    A250CMYK value - C:8%, M:20%, Y:50%, K:0%
    11X0CMYK value - C:13%, M:13%, Y:100%, K:0%
    0050CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:50%, K:0%
    A350CMYK value - C:8%, M:30%, Y:50%, K:0%
    41A0CMYK value - C:40%, M:13%, Y:8%, K:0%
    2460CMYK value - C:20%, M:40%, Y:60%, K:0%
    33X0CMYK value - C:30%, M:30%, Y:100%, K:0%
    0020CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:20%, K:0%

    ri2013-2-ContactsAndFaults
    Lines that record contacts between map units, faults that bound map units, and associated dangling faults (Source: NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    ContactsAn
    Primary key, uniquely identifies each line (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Alpha-numeric characters that uniquely identify each line. The general form: publication number of the report followed by an auto-generated numeric value.

    Type
    Specifies the kind of feature represented by the line (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    map boundaryLine that delineates and defines the extent of geographic and geologic data provided by this report.
    contactSurface expression of a plane or irregular surface that separates two distinct types or ages of rock.
    waterlineLine that delineates a boundary between water and land.

    IsConceale
    This is a flag to identify contacts and faults covered by an overlying map unit. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    NThe feature IS NOT covered by an overlying map unit.

    ExistenceC
    Indicates the degree of confidence and/or certainty in the interpretation of a each line segment's existence. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    certainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.

    IdentityCo
    Indicates degree of confidence in the identification and classification of the line segment (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    certainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.

    LocationCo
    Half-width in meters of positional uncertainty envelope; position is relative to other features in the data. A value of -9 indicates that this measure is not available. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    -9The author has not provided a numeric measurement of the likely error range of this feature.

    Symbol
    References the symbol value that was assigned to the line segment (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization; Appendix A. Geologic map symbols, colors, and patterns, "REF NO" field
    Codeset Source:Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    We thank the staff of Talon Gold Livengood for permission to enter their busy mining properties and for providing logistical support. Doug Baker kindly allowed access to his placer properties on upper Livengood Bench. The friendly hospitality of Larry Nelson, who let us camp at his placer mine, was greatly appreciated. Several field colleagues, including Jen Athey, Rainer Newberry, Dave Szumigala, and Melanie Werdon, mapped bedrock in the Livengood area and provided data that better delineated outcrops and subcrops in our surficial geology map. Tyler Cole, U.S. Bureau of Land Management in Fairbanks, efficiently provided GIS coverage of the recently mined area on upper Livengood Bench, which is incorporated into our map. Assistance in the field during 2003 was provided by Carrie Browne and Lauren Staft of DGGS. We welcome the insightful comments made in 2003 at the terminus of the ancient, large landslide on lower Amy Creek by Florence Weber (USGS) and De Anne Stevens (DGGS). Review comments by Diana Solie and Trent Hubbard that helped complete and clarify this report are greatly appreciated. Funding was provided to DGGS for this work by the State of Alaska and the U.S. Geological Survey (National Co-operative Geologic Mapping Program, STATEMAP award number 03HQAG0055).

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Attn: James Weakland
    GIS Analyst
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5029 (voice)
    dggsgis@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays


Why was the data set created?

The objective of this project was to produce 1:50,000-scale geologic maps of the area to foster a better understanding of the surficial geology, and the mineral and engineering-material resource potential of the Livengood area. This publication presents the surficial geology of the map area.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    Athey, J.E. and Craw, P.A., 2004 (source 1 of 4)
    Athey, J.E., and Craw, P.A., 2004, Geologic maps of the Livengood SW C-3 and SE C-4 quadrangles, Tolovana mining district, Alaska: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2004-3, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, AK, USA.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 24 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: document
    Source_Contribution: bedrock geology, description of map units

    Athey, J.E. and others, 2004a (source 2 of 4)
    Athey, J.E., Werdon, M.B., Newberry, R.J., Szumigala, D.J., Craw, P.A., and Hicks, S.A., 2004, Geologic map of the Livengood SW C-3 and SE C-4 quadrangles, Tolovana mining district, Alaska: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2004-3A, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, AK, USA.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 1 sheet, scale 1:50,000
    Type_of_Source_Media: map
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 50000
    Source_Contribution: bedrock geology

    Athey, J.E. and others, 2004b (source 3 of 4)
    Athey, J.E., Szumigala, D.J., Newberry, R.J., Werdon, M.B., and Hicks, S.A., 2004, Bedrock geologic map of the Livengood SW C-3 and SE C-4 quadrangles, Tolovana mining district, Alaska: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2004-3B, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, AK, USA.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 1 sheet, scale 1:50,000
    Type_of_Source_Media: map
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 50000
    Source_Contribution: bedrock geology

    Soller, D.R., 2009 (source 4 of 4)
    Soller, D.R., 2009, Digital Mapping Techniques '09-Workshop Proceedings, Morgantown, West Virginia, May 10-13, 2009: Open-File Report OF 2010-1335, U.S. Geological Survey, Fairbanks, AK, USA.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 260 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: document
    Source_Contribution: NCGMP09 geodatabase standard

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2003 (process 1 of 3)
    Air-photo interpretation and field verification - Units were mapped by interpreting 1:63,360-scale, false-color infrared aerial photographs taken in August 1978 and August 1986, and verified during five days of field checking in 2003 and two days in 2011. Tailings were mapped in the western Livengood Creek area using 1:6,000-scale aerial photographs taken in 2001. Preliminary mapping was carried out by Patty Burns and subsequently revised and finalized by Richard Reger. A comprehensive list of literature sources that were used to facilitate interpretation of the surficial units is provided on the printed map. Bedrock geology was mapped by Athey and Craw (2004) and Athey and others (2004a, b).

    Date: 2012 (process 2 of 3)
    Digitization of geologic map data - Digital scans of the air photos were orthorectified using OrthoMapper photogrammetric software. The co-registered acetate overlays of geologic mapping were then orthorectified using the same equations applied to the air photos. Resultant orthorectified map data were then imported into ArcGIS and heads-up digitized into a geodatabase with validated topology. Bedrock point data of locations of structural observations (strike, dip, cleavage, jointing, etc.) were intersected with the surficial-geologic polygons in order to identify locations that were mapped as surficial materials based on aerial photography but were found to have small exposures that were desirable to be mapped as bedrock. These areas were then modified in the surficial-geologic polygons to be areas of bedrock exposure. The geodatabase compiled by De Anne Stevens was converted to follow NCGMP09 database standards in conjunction with the final assimilation of both authors' interpretations. Waterbody lines and polygons were digitized from the underlying topographic base-maps and incorporated into the geodatabase.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • Athey, J.E. and Craw, P.A., 2004
    • Athey, J.E. and others, 2004a
    • Athey, J.E. and others, 2004b
    • Soller, D.R., 2009

    Date: 2013 (process 3 of 3)
    Revision of map data - Map was revised in response to technical reviews by Diana Solie and Trent Hubbard.

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Certainty in identification of the map units varies due to the scale and interpretive nature of the mapping. The geologic unit interpretations and boundaries presented in this map result from interpretation of 1:63,360-scale, false-color infrared aerial photographs taken in August 1978 and August 19861, investigative traverses throughout the map area, aerial reconnaissance via helicopter, and examination of river exposures. Tailings were mapped in the western Livengood Creek area using 1:6,000-scale aerial photographs taken in 2001. The air-photo interpretations were adjusted as needed to be consistent with bedrock exposures identified by Athey and others (2004a, b). Per NCGMP09 specifications, the authors have assigned a confidence value to each polygon and line segment to indicate their degree of confidence in the positioning and identification of the element at the mapped scale. This map has received two technical reviews by scientists familiar with the subject matter. The authors incorporated the reviewer's suggestions into the final draft.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    Surficial mappers recorded observations on 1:63,360 scale (nominal) color-infrared aerial photographs (with the exception of the western Livengood Creek area) and 1:63,360 scale USGS topographic base maps. The authors believe the total horizontal accuracy of the mapped surficial-geologic contacts is on the order of 25 m or better, with somewhat lesser accuracy expected in areas of rugged relief. Waterlines and waterbody polygons were entirely derived from topographic base maps, consequently it is possible that the mapped location and extent of these features may differ from modern ground conditions. Per NCGMP09 specifications, the authors have assigned a confidence value to each polygon and line record to indicate their degree of confidence in the positioning and identification of the element at the mapped scale. This map has received two technical reviews by scientists familiar with the subject matter. The authors incorporated the reviewer's suggestions into the final draft.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    This dataset provides shapefiles that display information about the mapped and interpreted surficial geologic deposits throughout the map area that are traceable on air photos at a scale of approximately 1:63,360 and/or in the field. No analytical tests were conducted for this report.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Polygon topology was implemented per NCGMP09 specifications (polygons must not overlap, polygons must not have gaps, boundaries must be overlain by lines in ContactsAndFaults). All polygon features were topologically validated using ArcGIS for Desktop prior to export to shapefile format.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (<http://www.dggs.alaska.gov>) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    RI 2013-2

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 31-Jul-2013
Metadata author:
Metadata manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)

Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.9.21 on Wed Jul 31 11:48:15 2013